A detailed “what to ask traders before signing” checklist
Reading the fine print of RES contracts: A practical guide for Serbian companies engaging with traders
Before Serbian industrial consumers commit to a long-term RES electricity contract, they must understand the mechanics underneath the offer. A trader’s quote is only the surface of a complex structure involving a merchant wind asset, balancing costs, forward-price hedges, collateral requirements and regulatory expectations. The conversation with the trader should uncover how the offer is constructed, who carries each risk layer and how future market conditions may influence the contract. The most important question concerns the production profile. The buyer must understand how the trader transforms irregular wind output into firm supply, what assumptions underpin this transformation and how deviation costs are allocated. If the trader captures wind at variable hourly prices and sells a flat block to the consumer, the difference must be hedged on the market. The buyer should ask how this hedge is executed, how much of the cost is embedded in the offered price and what happens during extreme system conditions when wholesale prices diverge from forecasts.
Equally important is clarity on balancing responsibility. The trader operates a balancing group, and every megawatt-hour delivered to the industry belongs to that group. The buyer should understand whether imbalance charges are fully absorbed by the trader or whether certain scenarios trigger pass-through arrangements. Serbia’s system imbalance prices can escalate sharply during stress conditions, and a contract that appears stable on paper can become financially dangerous if imbalance risk is not completely transferred. The buyer should therefore insist on an explanation of the trader’s balancing methodology, the historical performance of their portfolio and the risk limits they apply when integrating new industrial loads.
The next area that demands transparency is Guarantees of Origin. Traders may bundle them together with the physical supply or treat them as separate financial instruments. The buyer should confirm whether the contract guarantees one-to-one matching between consumption and GOs, how the cancellation procedure works, which registry is used, and how annual ESG reporting will be supported. Without these assurances, a company may purchase electricity linked to a wind park but lack the documentation necessary to declare its consumption as green.
Price formation requires its own line of inquiry. The buyer should ask the trader to describe the underlying forward curve, the hedging instruments deployed and the assumptions built into the fixed offer. Even a fully fixed price contains embedded expectations about future imports, cross-border capacities, hydrology, thermal-plant availability and regional supply-demand balance. The buyer should understand whether the trader plans to hedge the entire tenor at the start or gradually over time and how changes in liquidity on HUPX, OPCOM, IBEX and Greek forward markets affect pricing. A long-term offer is only as solid as the trader’s ability to manage these exposures, and buyers should seek confirmation that the counterparty has the capital, trading permission and market access required to execute the strategy.
Collateral and creditworthiness must be addressed openly. Traders posting guarantees to EMS and market operators will expect reciprocal security from industrial consumers. The buyer should ask what form of collateral is required, how its value is determined, and under what circumstances it may be called. At the same time, the buyer must evaluate the trader’s own financial strength. If the contract spans five or ten years, the trader’s balance sheet and access to liquidity become critical. The buyer should ask how the trader proves financial robustness, what their risk policy is regarding long-term obligations and whether they operate multiple balancing groups or rely on a single concentrated portfolio.
Finally, the buyer must explore how regulatory change is treated. Serbia is moving toward EU market integration, and rules governing grid fees, imbalance settlement, carbon exposure and market coupling will evolve. A trader’s offer may appear stable until a rule change shifts part of the cost structure. The buyer should ask how the contract handles such changes, whether certain components can be adjusted, and what constitutes a legitimate regulatory pass-through. Without this clarity, future policy shifts can undermine the predictability that the contract was meant to deliver.
A renewable electricity agreement is not a simple commodity contract but a long-term allocation of risk between an industrial consumer, a wind producer and a market intermediary. The questions above ensure that the buyer understands every layer of exposure and that no silent assumptions become future liabilities. In Serbia’s rapidly changing power market, the companies that demand full transparency before signing will secure the most resilient and strategically advantageous positions.
Powered by electricity.trade