By 2025 natural gas in South-East Europe is no longer only an energy commodity; it is a strategic risk variable, a price-setter for electricity in critical hours and a geopolitical transmission channel embedded directly in national economic stability. The region has diversified infrastructure, LNG access, interconnectors and reverse-flow capability far more than before 2022, yet most countries still rely heavily on imported volumes. The trading reality across Slovenia, Croatia, Hungary, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Albania, North Macedonia and Greece shows a landscape where some systems are relatively resilient thanks to infrastructure and diversified supply, while others remain structurally exposed.
Slovenia remains a relatively small but industrially important gas market. Annual consumption generally falls in the 0.8–1.2 billion cubic metre (bcm) range depending on winter severity and industrial activity. Almost all gas is imported, largely via connections with Austria and Italy, and Slovenia acts as both consumer and transit territory. Storage access is indirect through regional connections rather than large domestic caverns, meaning Slovenia’s resilience depends on European market integration rather than national stockpiling capacity. Prices in 2025 broadly align with Central European benchmarks, with industrial tariffs moving between roughly 40 and 60 euros per megawatt-hour depending on seasonal spreads and procurement strategy. Gas remains relevant but not dominant in Slovenia’s power mix, so its macro-level exposure is significant but manageable.
Croatia’s position is structurally stronger than many neighbours because of infrastructure rather than consumption volumes. Total Croatian gas demand sits near 2.5–3 bcm a year, with domestic production covering roughly a quarter to a third of needs in an average year and the rest imported. The Krk LNG terminal has fundamentally changed Croatia’s gas economy. It has turned the country into a regional supply gateway rather than a demand-captive system, with regasification capacity above Croatian domestic needs and the ability to supply Hungary, Slovenia and parts of the Western Balkans. In practical terms, this means Croatia’s gas trade balance is still import-positive in volume terms, but strategically favourable. Domestic consumers and the power sector benefit from flexibility and optionality, while gas traders monetise transit and supply contracts. Price levels follow European TTF-linked indices but often with lower risk premiums due to security of access.
Hungary is one of the largest gas consumers in the region and structurally dependent on imports despite sizable storage. Annual Hungarian demand fluctuates between 9 and 11 bcm, with industrial use, district heating and power generation driving consumption. Imports come primarily through interconnectors with Austria and Serbia, with Russia-linked supply routes still economically significant. Hungary maintains one of the largest storage capacities in Central Europe, typically covering a material share of annual demand, which significantly strengthens its negotiating and resilience position. However, prices paid by industries and wholesale buyers remain highly sensitive to European gas market trends because gas sets marginal electricity prices frequently. The Hungarian market is therefore simultaneously robust in physical security terms and financially exposed to price volatility.
Serbia remains extremely dependent on imported gas. Annual demand generally ranges between 2.5 and 3.2 bcm, with almost no domestic production and heavy reliance on pipeline supplies via the TurkStream corridor through Bulgaria. Storage at Banatski Dvor provides some seasonal buffer, but storage capacity remains small relative to total national needs. Gas is used primarily in heating, industry and increasingly for balancing in the electricity sector. Because Serbia lacks LNG access and remains dependent on a single dominant supply route, its gas trading position is structurally sensitive to geopolitical risk and pricing power dynamics, even as contractual mechanisms and regional interconnections have evolved to improve flexibility. Industrial gas prices in Serbia tend to track regional levels with moderate premiums due to supply risk and exchange structure.
Romania is the most structurally advantaged gas player in South-East Europe. Annual consumption typically lies in the 10–12 bcm range, and domestic production covers the majority of demand, fluctuating with seasonal and field performance. Major offshore developments are now reshaping Romania’s gas balance for the decade ahead, reinforcing its transition toward a more self-reliant, potentially export-capable gas system. While Romania still imports during winter peaks or when economics favour it, its strategic risk profile is very different to fully import-dependent neighbours. Gas prices in Romania still align with European market dynamics, but the domestic resource cushion softens supply insecurity and long-term planning risk. In trading terms, Romania stands closest to a position of potential regional supplier within this decade.
Bulgaria has undergone one of the fastest transformations in the region. Historically almost fully dependent on a single supplier, Bulgaria in 2025 secures gas through multiple channels, including pipeline gas from neighbouring systems and LNG via neighbouring terminals. Domestic demand sits near 3 bcm annually, heavily influenced by industrial activity rather than household dependence. Bulgaria’s interconnector development has strengthened its role as a regional gas hub, enabling transit toward Serbia, Romania and Greece. Nevertheless, Bulgaria remains a net importer, and domestic consumption responds directly to price movements. Wholesale and industrial price levels move broadly in the 40–70 euros per MWh corridor depending on season and procurement timing.
Bosnia and Herzegovina is a structurally gas-poor system in both supply and infrastructure capacity. Annual consumption is typically under 0.5 bcm, concentrated in Sarajevo and several industrial users. Supply is almost entirely dependent on pipeline routes via Serbia, with no LNG access and extremely limited storage. Because Bosnia’s overall power sector is dominated by coal and hydro, gas is not a broad system cornerstone in energy terms, but for the industries and cities that depend on it, exposure is absolute. Gas prices tend to be structurally higher and risk premium-laden because of limited alternatives and infrastructure constraints.
Montenegro consumes very small quantities of natural gas, under 0.1 bcm annually in most recent years, with no national transmission system in full practical use and no widespread gasification. In trading terms, Montenegro is marginal in the regional gas market, but strategically this means the country lacks flexibility that gas can provide in energy balancing and industrial diversification. Montenegro’s exposure to gas markets is more indirect—via electricity pricing—than direct via domestic gas trade.
Albania historically consumes negligible natural gas volumes, despite being adjacent to one of Europe’s major modern pipeline corridors through the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline. Domestic gas use is almost non-existent at national system scale, although industrial, petrochemical and future power sector needs expose Albania to medium-term gas decisions. In 2025 Albania’s gas trading relevance remains infrastructural rather than volumetric: its long-term strategic posture depends on whether it leverages transit position into domestic and regional value, or remains almost absent from the gas consumption map.
North Macedonia remains strongly dependent on imported gas. Annual consumption sits near 0.4–0.6 bcm, almost entirely supplied by cross-border import routes. Gas supports both industry and segments of the electricity system but lacks diversification. Storage is absent and import structures limit negotiation leverage. Prices therefore reflect regional imports with modest premiums and volatility sensitivity. For North Macedonia, gas remains critical yet structurally risky.
Greece occupies one of the most strategic positions in the regional gas architecture. Annual Greek demand typically runs between 6 and 7 bcm, driven heavily by power generation. Greece has robust LNG infrastructure through Revithoussa and additional terminals coming online, along with interconnectors to Bulgaria and onward to the Balkans. This makes Greece both a consumer and a gateway supplier into South-East Europe. Gas trading volumes through Greece are significant, making it a regional balancing supply source when neighbouring systems face scarcity. Prices in Greece remain high relative to some regional peers due to gas reliance in power pricing but benefit from security of access and diversification.
If these national trading realities are viewed together, a coherent regional picture emerges. Romania stands closest to gas autonomy, Croatia and Greece act as strategic gateways, Bulgaria is evolving into a multi-route connector, Hungary remains a heavy but well-buffered importer, Serbia is materially exposed but operationally functional under current supply arrangements, while Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia and Montenegro remain small, vulnerable or structurally constrained gas markets.
Price formation across the region follows European wholesale benchmarks but with structural premiums that depend on infrastructure strength, contract diversity and political risk. Countries with LNG or diversified access pay lower risk premiums and face more predictable procurement economics. Countries dependent on single routes or limited storage pay higher uncertainty costs. Gas still influences electricity pricing heavily in Greece, Hungary, Romania and partially in Bulgaria, shaping industrial costs and macro-competitiveness.
In strategic terms, 2025 confirms three realities. First, supply diversification is now a permanent structural asset that directly shapes macroeconomic strength. Second, infrastructure equals leverage: LNG terminals, interconnectors and storage facilities are not engineering assets, they are financial stabilisers. Third, countries that continue to rely on narrow gas portfolios will increasingly face higher price volatility, higher procurement risk and tighter policy space.
South-East Europe’s gas trading system in 2025 is therefore neither stable nor fragile; it is resilient but asymmetrical. Some states are secure, others exposed, and all remain tied to a European price environment that can change quickly. The policy and investment choices made between now and 2030—new LNG, new interconnections, storage expansion, domestic production, or accelerated electrification and renewables to reduce demand—will decide which countries treat gas as a managed strategic input and which remain vulnerable to every shock in the global energy system.
Elevated by virtu.energy