Battery energy storage systems have shifted from speculative conversation to structural necessity in Southeast Europe. The question is no longer whether battery storage will become central to the region’s electricity systems, but how quickly it will scale, how deeply it will influence price formation, how strongly it will reinforce supply security, and how it will shape the investment reality for renewable generators and system operators. What began as single-site deployments of tens of megawatts in the early 2020s has now matured into pipelines of hundreds of megawatts coming online annually, with long-term system planning incorporating storage not as an auxiliary feature but as a core capacity tool. The next decade, running from 2025 through 2035, will define whether Southeast Europe becomes a flexible, renewable-anchored, price-stabilised regional power ecosystem or whether it continues struggling through volatility and fossil dependence. The decisive factor is battery storage.
A measurable installed base by 2025 and structurally meaningful pipeline for 2026
By the end of 2025, Southeast Europe has between 400 and 500 megawatts of operational BESS power capacity and roughly 800 to 1,100 megawatt-hours of stored energy capability installed, primarily concentrated in Bulgaria and Greece, with early activity in Romania, Croatia, Slovenia and initial steps in Serbia. Bulgaria’s operating systems account for more than 200 MW and approximately 600–750 MWh, including a 65 MW / 260 MWh plant already in commercial operation. Greece contributes around 50 MW / 120+ MWh, adding balancing flexibility in a system frequently strained by solar and wind variability. Romania, Croatia and Slovenia possess a mix of operational smaller systems and pipeline ready projects.
The period between late 2025 and the close of 2026 marks a structural step change. Confirmed under-construction or near-financial-close projects represent 600 to 800 MW of additional storage, translating to 1,200 to 3,200 MWh of new flexible capability. Bulgaria will add a 150 MW four-hour system, providing 600 MWh of continuous discharge tolerance, while Romania’s 200 MW / 400 MWh system enters service, Croatia and Slovenia launch 60 MW / 120 MWh distributed models, and Serbia’s first wave of hybrid solar and storage begins building real capacity estimated initially at 100–200 MW. By year-end 2026, Southeast Europe will operate more than 1.0 to 1.3 gigawatts of battery capacity with 2 to 2.5 gigawatt-hours of stored energy.
At this scale, storage ceases to be technical novelty and becomes systemic infrastructure. These capacities are numerically sufficient to support between 1.5 and 2 million households through peak hours, or to displace multiple gas peaking plants during stress events, or to stabilise several gigawatts of variable renewable output across regional grids.
The production and price environment that makes storage mathematically necessary
Southeast European electricity systems increasingly operate under volatility however predictable its causes. Solar penetration has exploded, wind capacity has increased significantly, transmission upgrades lag structural need, and interconnection capacity, while improving, cannot compensate for regional synchronisation gaps. The result is energy abundance during midday solar peaks, frequently forcing prices toward €10 to €35 per megawatt-hour, and in extreme cases to zero or negative pricing. Conversely, evening demand surges and weather-triggered renewable drops can trigger price spikes of €150 to €300 per MWh and sometimes much higher.
Battery storage harvests value inside these spreads. Storage cycles through low price acquisition and high price release, locking financial opportunity into operational stability. Existing SEE batteries perform between 1 and 3 cycles per day, meaning 365 to 1,000 cycles annually depending on participation in arbitrage or reserve regimes. A 200 MW / 400 MWh two-hour battery operating over a year can inject hundreds of gigawatt-hours of balancing energy, replacing the equivalent output of substantial fossil-fired units. Depending on spread frequency, BESS assets generate between €80,000 and €140,000 per megawatt annually in arbitrage revenue and €50,000 to €120,000 per megawatt annually in ancillary service revenue, producing commercially credible investment cases.
The quantified stabilising role and real economic value
Battery storage exerts stabilising effects in three simultaneous dimensions. It reduces physical stress on the grid through fast balancing capability. It reduces price volatility by moderating extreme high and low intervals. And it increases renewable value by absorbing surplus energy that would otherwise be curtailed.
In real system data terms, even 100 to 200 MW of operational battery capacity has already demonstrated measurable reductions in peak pricing in select SEE markets, moderating peaks by €20 to €60 per MWh under stressed conditions. From a system operator’s view, this materially reduces grid imbalance costs, consumer cost impact and industrial uncertainty.
Batteries also materially influence frequency resilience. When a 50 MW sub-second response battery replaces slow-response thermal contingency cover, grid frequency deviation events drop substantially, typically by 10 to 30 percent, while emergency reserve procurement volumes decline over time. This is invaluable in systems where renewable penetration occasionally pushes beyond 40 percent instantaneous generation, leaving power systems with sharply reduced inertia.
On network infrastructure timelines, batteries delay or prevent investments worth tens to hundreds of millions of euros. Batteries reduce peak loading by 5–15 percent in stressed corridors, meaning expensive new lines or substations can be postponed, phased differently or avoided entirely. For TSOs managing constrained north–south or east–west corridors, this is not just operational convenience; it is a capital efficiency transformation.
TSO storage requirements and capacity planning logic
Transmission system operators in Southeast Europe no longer view storage as optional. Instead, flexibility requirements have been numerically assessed and documented. Across Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, Serbia and neighbouring states, projected flexibility demand by 2030 ranges between 2,000 and 3,000 MW of fast-acting resources. Of this amount, system planners attribute at least 1,200 to 1,800 MW to storage as the most technically efficient option when compared to new gas plants, hydro expansion or major demand response activation.
Reserve requirements likewise evolve. Where primary and secondary reserves once totalled 300–800 MW, projected flexible reserve needs will reach 600–1,200 MW in several regional systems by the early 2030s. Batteries meet these reserve requirements with vastly superior response time. TSOs are approving connection capacities ranging from 20 MW per node in weaker distribution zones to over 150 MW per connection point in transmission-connected locations strategically positioned to counter congestion or renewable concentration.
This changes planning psychology. Storage is no longer considered merely merchant infrastructure but is instead becoming partially comparable to regulated grid stability infrastructure. Whether financed through merchant channels, auctions, capacity markets or hybrid public–private frameworks, the functional logic remains the same: batteries are being positioned to protect voltage stability, enable inertia substitution, maintain frequency discipline and secure continuity of supply.
CAPEX, OPEX and cost maturity in quantified form
By 2025, installed battery system costs in Southeast Europe now sit between €180 and €350 per kilowatt-hour for most utility-scale projects depending on connection complexity, engineering design, regulatory friction, civil construction needs and storage duration.
A 200 MW / 400 MWh facility therefore requires typically €72 to €140 million. A 150 MW / 600 MWh four-hour configuration requires €108 to €210 million. Smaller installations such as 60 MW / 120 MWh tend to require €22 to €42 million, depending heavily on siting conditions.
Annual operating expenditures are consistently between 1.5 and 3.5 percent of installed capital cost, meaning a €120 million system incurs €1.8 to €4.2 million in annual operating costs. This includes replacement of inverters generally between year seven and ten, operational management, telemetry, structural maintenance and insurance. Degradation curves remain predictable: storage systems lose 1 to 2 percent usable capacity per year on average, but many modern chemistries and operational strategies mitigate more severe fading.
Compared against revenue potential, these costs provide sustainable long-term business models. Over life cycles, 200 MW storage systems in favourable SEE volatility structures may produce €150 to €260 million or more in lifetime gross revenue, adequate for reasonable IRR and stable infrastructure returns even before policy frameworks enhance certainty.
Market influence overtakes supportive rhetoric and becomes structural force
Battery deployment changes markets in more ways than it simply participates in them. As storage penetration scales, daily price spreads compress, balancing costs fall, renewable curtailment declines and overall system costs flatten. A region currently owning less than 1 GWh of operational storage will soon possess 5 GWh by the early 2030s, reducing price spikes significantly and lowering vulnerability to gas market shock. That level of capacity can secure between 5 and 7 gigawatts of renewable generation capacity, providing smoother production ramping and less system stress.
Energy security benefits compound in parallel. Under supply shortage events, cross-border power values skyrocket, but internal storage reduces dependence on imports or crisis-priced generation. By the time the region reaches 8 to 12 GWh of storage by 2035, annual renewable curtailment avoided could exceed 400 to 700 GWh, unlocking monetisable clean electricity and reducing system inefficiency.
Battery capacity will therefore stand side-by-side with gas units, hydropower buffers and interconnectors as foundational strategic assets underpinning Southeast Europe’s electricity security posture.
Annual storage deployment scenarios for Southeast Europe: 2025–2035
To understand long-term system evolution, annual deployment must be quantified. While every year will not behave identically, the following structured trajectory describes a realistic, financially and infrastructure-grounded pathway.
2025 baseline
By the end of 2025, the region already operates 400–500 MW of power and approximately 1 GWh of energy storage. Installed projects exist primarily in Bulgaria and Greece, supported by emerging yet non-trivial installations in other SEE states.
2026 acceleration year
By the close of 2026, storage crosses psychological and operational thresholds. New capacity takes total power near 1.0–1.3 GW and storage energy beyond 2.0–2.5 GWh. This is the year operators begin treating batteries as dependable operational backbone.
2027 consolidation and maturation
By 2027, Southeast Europe should advance to 1.6–2.0 GW of installed storage power and 3–4 GWh of energy, driven by Romania scaling further, Bulgaria implementing multiple awarded projects, Greece continuing robust frameworks, Croatia expanding distributed networks and Serbia accelerating hybrid deployments.
2028 infrastructure shaping year
By 2028, storage capacity expectedly reaches 2.2–2.8 GW of power and 4.5–6 GWh energy capacity, now directly influencing TSO infrastructure planning, effectively acting as virtual transmission support, and deeply stabilising intraday market efficiency.
2029 pre-maturity stability transition
By 2029, the region could control 3.0–3.5 GW of storage and around 7 GWh, coinciding with strengthened renewable capacity reaching new national thresholds. At this point, renewable penetration is supported technically and financially at levels that would otherwise risk reliability.
2030 milestone year
By 2030, Southeast Europe is realistically operating 3.5–4.5 GW of storage delivering 8–9 GWh. Hydrogen and gas remain in the system but in reduced role. Balancing cost declines may reach 15–25 percent compared to mid-2020s levels, resilience improves materially, and TSOs integrate batteries fully into normal reserve strategies.
2031–2032 system reinforcement phase
During these two years, total storage capability may grow toward 5.0–6.0 GW and 10–11 GWh, as both late Western Balkan states and EU-aligned SEE economies deepen storage build-out. Flexibility evolves from mitigating volatility to shaping economy stability.
2033–2034 strategic consolidation
By mid-2030s, cumulative installed capacity pushes toward 6.5–7.5 GW and 11–12 GWh, representing one of the most significant infrastructure evolutions in modern SEE energy history.
2035 strategic maturity
By 2035, Southeast Europe operates a mature, fully strategic storage landscape with 7–8 GW of installed BESS capacitydelivering 12–14 GWh of stored energy across integrated systems. Renewable contribution comfortably sustains 60–70 percent electricity penetration at times without structural system risk, and electricity markets stabilise into more predictable yet competitively active environments. Curtailment is reduced by hundreds of gigawatt-hours annually, price extremes are moderated, grid stress is measurably reduced, and dependence on volatile fossil price exposures falls sharply.
Defined future, quantified requirements, operational confidence
Over the decade ahead, battery storage in Southeast Europe will define whether the region experiences a stable renewable transition or a disorderly one. The numbers clearly point to an organised, economically justifiable, technically grounded transformation where storage capacity increases stepwise each year, aligning with TSO system requirements, investment logic and renewable expansion trajectories.
By 2026, storage becomes embedded in operations. By 2030, it becomes indispensable infrastructure. By 2035, it becomes strategic backbone capability on par with generation fleets and interconnectors.
Battery energy storage is not merely equipment; it is Southeast Europe’s future reliability guarantee, price stabiliser, renewable enabler and security asset — now measurable in megawatts, megawatt-hours, euros avoided, system failures prevented and national resilience preserved.
Elevated by virtu.energy