By 2025, battery storage in Southeast Europe stopped being discussed primarily as a grid-resilience accessory and started being deployed as a direct revenue instrument for renewable electricity producers. This shift did not come from policy ambition or climate targets, but from hard commercial pressure. Solar penetration reached levels where unprotected midday output destroyed price realisation, while intraday volatility widened enough to reward even modest temporal flexibility. Storage became the financial adapter between renewable production profiles and market price reality.
The economic trigger was visible first in Greece and Bulgaria. By mid-2025, utility-scale solar output frequently drove noon prices into the €30–45 per MWh range, with isolated zero-price intervals during high-irradiation weekends. For fully merchant solar assets, this represented a structural erosion of captured value rather than temporary volatility. Capacity factors remained healthy at 18–21 percent, but realised prices lagged generation-weighted expectations by €12–20 per MWh. In response, producers began installing short-duration batteries not to chase ancillary services, but to avoid selling power at the wrong hour.
The dominant configuration in SEE during 2025 was 1–2 hours of lithium-ion storage co-located with solar plants. Capital costs fell sharply relative to Western Europe, settling in a corridor of €450,000–650,000 per MWh installed, depending on inverter integration and grid connection complexity. This pricing reflected proximity to EU supply chains, lower EPC overheads and simplified permitting in several SEE jurisdictions. For a typical 50 MW solar plant, a 50–100 MWh battery represented incremental CAPEX of €22–55 million, a meaningful but manageable addition relative to total project cost.
The revenue effect was immediate and measurable. Storage-enabled solar assets shifted output from midday compression windows into late afternoon and early evening hours, where prices in 2025 averaged €15–30 per MWh higher across most SEE markets. Even partial shifting captured meaningful uplift. Producers deploying 1-hour batteries improved average realised prices by €10–14 per MWh, while 2-hour systems reached €14–20 per MWh, depending on local price curves. These gains were not theoretical; they were visible in settlement data.
Importantly, this uplift translated almost directly into EBITDA. Operating costs for batteries in SEE remained modest, typically €6–10 per MWh cycled, including degradation provisions. With incremental revenue exceeding incremental OPEX by a wide margin, storage add-ons lifted portfolio EBITDA margins by 8–15 percentage points for solar-heavy assets. For projects already operating at 45–55 percent EBITDA margins, this pushed returns into territory previously associated only with contracted wind or legacy hydro.
Romania demonstrated a slightly different dynamic. There, solar penetration was lower, but intraday volatility was amplified by cross-border flows and wind variability. Batteries were used less for pure midday avoidance and more for intraday arbitrage and imbalance reduction. In 2025, imbalance penalties for unoptimised solar and wind assets averaged €3–6 per MWh, occasionally spiking higher during forecast error events. Storage reduced imbalance exposure by 30–50 percent, adding another €2–4 per MWh of effective value beyond price shifting alone.
In Bulgaria, the commercial logic was stark. Solar capacity approached levels where grid curtailment became visible during peak hours. Storage-equipped plants experienced materially lower curtailment rates, often below 2 percent, compared with 4–7 percent for non-hybrid installations during summer months. Avoided curtailment effectively acted as additional generation, improving annual output monetisation without increasing nominal capacity.
Greece pushed the model further by allowing storage-equipped renewables to participate selectively in balancing and reserve markets. While ancillary revenues were not the primary driver, they provided upside optionality. In 2025, balancing services contributed 5–10 percent of total storage-linked revenue for some hybrid assets, improving payback resilience without altering the core business case.
Serbia entered the storage discussion from a different starting point. Solar penetration remained lower, but price volatility and grid rigidity created similar incentives. Behind-the-meter and industrial solar installations increasingly paired storage to manage peak tariffs and avoid grid congestion. Effective avoided retail prices often exceeded €120 per MWh, making even modest batteries economically rational. Payback periods for commercial solar-plus-storage systems in Serbia compressed to 7–10 years, materially shorter than early planning assumptions.
From an investor perspective, storage altered risk profiles more than headline returns. Standalone solar assets exposed to merchant pricing showed wide dispersion in cash flows. Storage narrowed that dispersion, improving debt service coverage and stabilising dividend capacity. In financing terms, banks began recognising this effect. By late 2025, hybrid projects secured 20–40 basis point reductions in debt margins compared with merchant-only solar, reflecting improved cash-flow predictability.
The strategic implication is that storage in SEE is not being deployed as infrastructure in search of a revenue model. It is being installed precisely where it protects or enhances existing renewable cash flows. This discipline matters. The region has largely avoided the overbuild mistakes seen in early Western European battery markets, where speculative installations chased uncertain ancillary revenues.
There are limits. Battery degradation, replacement cycles and residual value assumptions remain key sensitivities. Most financial models in SEE assume 10–12 years before major battery augmentation is required. Even under conservative assumptions, internal rates of return on incremental storage CAPEX in 2025 clustered around 9–14 percent, competitive with core generation returns and achieved with lower regulatory exposure.
Looking forward, storage is becoming inseparable from solar development in high-penetration SEE markets. By the end of 2025, new utility-scale solar projects in Greece and Bulgaria were increasingly designed as hybrid by default. Storage is no longer a speculative add-on; it is the mechanism through which solar remains investable as penetration rises.
The broader effect is structural. Storage shifts renewable electricity from a volume-driven business to a time-value business. In Southeast Europe’s evolving power markets, that shift is proving decisive. Solar assets without flexibility are increasingly price takers. Hybrid assets, even with modest batteries, regain pricing agency. That distinction will define renewable performance in SEE well beyond 2025.
Elevated by virtu.energy